Software Development
Grapefruit's quality assurance and software testing services catch defects before your users do. Our QA engineers run functional, regression, performance, compatibility, accessibility and security testing, manual and automated, from the first sprint. We test products we build and platforms built by other teams, and report risks in language product owners can act on.
Clients for this service: Work for SCUT, Renault Romania
Risk-based plan covering what to test, how and when.
Manual and automated test suites for critical journeys.
Behaviour under realistic and peak traffic.
WCAG checks and browser and device coverage.
Common vulnerability checks aligned with OWASP guidance.
1-2 weeks
Review of current quality, risks and test coverage.
You get: Quality assessment · Test strategy
2-6 weeks
Automated regression tests for the journeys that make money.
You get: Automated test suite
Ongoing
Functional, regression and exploratory testing inside each sprint.
You get: Test reports · Release sign-off
1-3 weeks
Load, accessibility and security testing before peaks and launches.
You get: Load test report · Remediation list
AI in this service
AI helps QA cover more ground: generating test cases from requirements, drafting automated test scripts and spotting patterns in failures. Our QA engineers review every generated test. For products with AI features, we also test what traditional QA misses: answer accuracy, hallucinations, prompt injection and behaviour when the model is uncertain.
Proof
SCUT · Technology & SaaS
3 weeks from kickoff to launch, end to end
Renault Romania · Automotive
+20% website traffic
Know the real state of your platform before you invest in it.
Cannot find your question? Ask a senior specialist directly.
Functional, regression, compatibility, performance and load, API, accessibility, user acceptance support and security testing, both manual and automated. The mix depends on your risks: a campaign platform needs load testing, a bank portal needs security and accessibility, an app needs device coverage.
From the first sprint. QA engineers review requirements and designs for testability, then test every increment. Defects found early cost far less to fix than defects found after launch, and release dates stop slipping because of late surprises.
Yes. Independent QA is useful when you want an objective view of a vendor's quality or before accepting a delivery. We start with a short assessment and then test releases or build an automated regression suite your team can keep running.
Both. Automation covers stable, repeated checks on critical journeys so every release is verified quickly. Manual exploratory testing finds usability problems and unexpected behaviour that scripts miss. We recommend the balance based on release frequency and product maturity.
We build evaluation sets with expected answers, measure accuracy and hallucination rates, try adversarial inputs such as prompt injection, and check behaviour at the edges: missing data, ambiguous questions and hand-off to humans. Results are reported as risks with recommended guardrails.
QA Team Leader · talk to us about quality assurance & testing
Tell us what you need and by when. A senior specialist replies with a clear next step, not a sales deck.
We reply within 1 business day, usually the same day. Not ready to talk? Take the free AI assessment.
